Case File

The Worldwide Fake Bomb Detector Scam

Author
World Peace Foundation
Published on
December 6, 2020
(updated October 13, 2022)
Image
Iraqi soldiers and U.S. Soldiers hold random security checks during a security checkpoint mission in Abu T'Shir, Iraq, Oct. 16, 2008. Image Source: U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Todd Frantom/Released
Iraqi soldiers and U.S. Soldiers hold random security checks during a security checkpoint mission in Abu T'Shir, Iraq, Oct. 16, 2008. Image Source: U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Todd Frantom/Released

Contents

Contents

top

Introduction

Introduction

contents

In the decade following the late-1990s, a network of intrepid fraudsters sold fake bomb detectors worth tens of millions of dollars to security services around the world, most notably Iraq, Thailand and Mexico. The fake bomb detectors, variously marketed as the ADE 651, GT200, Alpha Six, and, earlier, the MOLE Programmable Detection System, Quadro Tracker, and Sniffex, were completely non-functional and sold solely for the purpose of enriching its producers – and the people they bribed to sell the phony goods.

Case Details

Case details

contents
Seller country
United Kingdom
Buyer country
Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, India, Iraq, Lebanon, Mexico, Niger, Pakistan, Syria, Thailand, Uzbekistan
Equipment sold
Fake bomb detectors marketed variously as the ADE 651, GT200, Alpha 6, and other names. 5000 sold to Iraq, 1400 to Thailand. 1200 to Mexico.
Deal value
Over USD 85 million (probably over USD 100 million)
Sum involved in corruption
Unclear
Start year
1999
End year
2010
Outcome status
Trial Closed - Convictions

Actors

Actors

contents

  • James McCormick — leading marketer of the devices (primarily as the ADE 651). Convicted, jailed for 10 years in 2013.

  • Gary Bolton — leading marketer of the GT200 variant. Convicted, jailed for seven years in 2013.

  • Samuel Tree — marketer of the Alpha 6 variant. Convicted, jailed for 3.5 years in 2014.

  • Joan Tree — marketer of the Alpha 6 variant. Ordered to serve 300 hours of community service.

  • Malcolm Stig Roe — original developer of the Gopher golf-ball finder and business partner of the UK-based marketers. Currently [living]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-07-11/in-iraq-the-bomb-detecting-device-that-didnt-work-except-to-make-money) in Turkish-controlled northern Cyprus.

  • Pierre Georgiou — a retired Lebanese general who acted as an endorser and agent.

Allegations

Summary of Corruption Allegations

contents

This was a case of pure fraud, whereby plastic boxes with a swiveling antenna, sometimes also fitted out with simple electronics that served no function, were marketed around the world as bomb detectors, and sometimes as being adaptable – via various ‘cards’ to detecting drugs and other illegal substances. The devices were completely useless by design.

Timeline

Timeline

contents
2000
  • The forerunner of the fake bomb detectors was another device, the “Gopher”, which was marketed in the United States as a device for finding lost golf balls. This was adapted by an American businessman, Malcolm Stig Roe, into a supposed drug detector, which was sold to some schools and law enforcement agencies before the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation tested it and found it worthless and warned law enforcement agencies not to buy it. Roe then moved to the United Kingdom where heteamed up with a British couple, Samuel and Joan Tree, who were in the security business, and two international salesmen, Gary Bolton and James McCormick, who developed the project. The resulting devices were essentially slightly modified versions of the “Gopher.” Serious international marketing of the ‘bomb detectors’ seems to have begun in 2000. The group split up, each selling a different version of the fraudulent device.
2006
  • McCormick’s operation took off after 2006, when he secured a deal with a manufacturing company to produce larger and more impressive versions of the device.
2010
  • The devices cost about GBP 2 each to assemble, but were sold for around GBP 5,000 each, and sometimes as much as GBP 22,000, and in one case GBP 500,000. Figures for total sales are not available, but looking at the prices and numbers for the biggest customer countries, it seems likely that the total sales value was well over USD 100 million. Iraq was likely the single biggest buyer, spending GBP 53 million on at least 5,000 devices.

Outcomes

Investigation Outcomes

contents
1999
  • The device was tested by the Royal Engineers in 1999 and found to be unreliable, but Bolton doctored letters claiming that the device had received a recommendation.
2001
  • Despite the fact that the devices were tested again in 2001, this time by UK Home Office scientists and again found to be fake, the companies continued to operate and sell them, and received promotional support from various branches of the UK government, including the Embassy in Mexico, UK Trade & Industry, who provided support for displaying the equipment at trade fairs, and members of the military who exhibited the devices. Predecessor devices had been tested and found useless by the United States’ Sandia National Laboratories in 2002 and by the U.S. Navy Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division in 2005.
2009
  • Frequent reports in 2009 from UK and U.S. personnel in Iraq that the devices didn’t work led to an investigation by the local police in Avon & Somerset, where McCormick operated.
  • The inspector general’s office in the Iraqi Interior Ministry launched an investigation in 2009;
2010
  • In 2010, an export ban was imposed on the devices by the United Kingdom.
  • McCormick and others were arrested in 2010.
2011
  • One of the devices’ primary proponents, Major General Jihad al-Jabiri, was arrested in Iraq in 2011.
2012
  • Juhad al-Jabiri was sentenced to four years in prison for corruption.
2013
  • MCormick and others were convicted in 2013, with McCormick receiving ten years imprisonment and Bolton seven. McCormick subsequently was required to forfeit GBP8 million.
2016
  • The use of the fake bomb detectors naturally led to numerous deaths in the countries where they were used. At McCormick’s trial, prosecutors pointed out that bombs targeting the Iraqi foreign and justice ministries had passed through checkpoints equipped with the fake devices. In at least some of the countries that bought variants of the devices, in particular Iraq and Thailand, corruption in the military was also a factor in the sales. A report of the U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraqi Reconstruction estimated in 2011 that 75% of the value of McCormick’s revenue had been recycled as bribes. In Thailand, the devices not only allowed through real explosives, but in the south of the country, where there is an ongoing conflict with a separatist rebel group, security forces have used the devices to justify the false imprisonment, of hundreds of people, according to rights groups. As of mid-2016, the interior minister has indicated its willingness to cooperate with an ongoing investigation run by the Auditor-General, National Anti-Corruption Commission, and the government’s own anti-corruption commission. An importer was acquitted in March 2018 of fraud related to the scam, with the court finding that the prosecution had failed to show that the firm was involved in producing fraudulent marketing materials. Given that the army’s purchase of these devices was originally authorized by the current prime minister, Prayuth Chan-o-cha, it is unclear how far the investigation will be allowed to proceed. Meanwhile, in Mexico the devices have been widely used by security forces in the war on drugs. In at least one criminal case, the defendant was released because of expert testimony on the fake nature of the GT200. However, this has not stopped the devices being used, or even led to a general ban on their admissibility as evidence. Due to stalling by the army in providing a sample device, no tests have been conducted for the purposes of judicial proceedings, and as a result, the Mexican Supreme Court has been unable to set binding precedent on the reliability of the devices. The Supreme Court has indicated that evidence from the GT200 should not be grounds for home searches, a fairly limited restriction on its admissibility. Thus, while the perpetrators of this fraud have been punished, the fake bomb detectors continue to do serious harm in the countries that bought them, due to the corruption and lack of accountability of their security establishments.

References

References

contents